This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by McKENDRICK, J. H. Articles by FIELDER, A. V. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Kid Customer?

Commercialization of Playspace and the Commodification of Childhood

Glasgow Caledonian University j.mckendrick{at}gcal.ac.uk

MICHAEL G. BRADFORD

University of Manchester

ANNA V. FIELDER

University of Manchester

The growth of commercial playgrounds in the UK is part of a broader process whereby ever greater realms of children's lives are commodified. McNeal's theory of the social group of children as a market is introduced as a framework through which commercial playgrounds may be understood. An introduction to commercial playgrounds and the project from which the article is derived sets the context for an analysis of how parents and children perceive and experience these environments, how they are marketed to them and how they consume them. It is found that it is overly simplistic to suggest that these new developments are testimony to the new-found consumer power of children. Children play a marginal role: in the production of these play environments; in contributing to parents' information field prior to decision-making; and in the visit decision-making process. Some groups of children are found to be more active consumers of these spaces; children with fewer siblings and children outside two-parent families being significantly more likely to contribute to decision-making. However, `active consumption' is not distributed evenly across different types of commercial playground. Of particular significance is that children are more marginal to the decision-making process for family pubs, the domain which has traditionally been the preserve of adults. In conclusion, it is argued that the social group of children is not a primary, secondary or tertiary market. Rather, these new commercial playgrounds provide primarily for the needs of adults (for themselves and with respect to how they want their children to play) and, to a lesser extent, for the needs of children.

Key Words: children • commercial • commodification • consumer society • geographies of childhood • playgrounds

Childhood, Vol. 7, No. 3, 295-314 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/0907568200007003004


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Ansell Childhood and the politics of scale: descaling children's geographies? Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 190 - 209. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Mansvelt Geographies of consumption: the unmanageable consumer? Progress in Human Geography, April 1, 2009; 33(2): 264 - 274. [PDF]

				P. Darbyshire `Childhood': are reports of its death greatly exaggerated? J Child Health Care, June 1, 2007; 11(2): 85 - 97. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. T. Cook The Dichotomous Child in and of Commercial Culture Childhood, May 1, 2005; 12(2): 155 - 159. [PDF]

				L. Martens, D. Southerton, and S. Scott Bringing Children (and Parents) into the Sociology of Consumption: Towards a Theoretical and Empirical Agenda Journal of Consumer Culture, July 1, 2004; 4(2): 155 - 182. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. H. McKENDRICK The Geography of Children: An Annotated Bibliography Childhood, August 1, 2000; 7(3): 359 - 387. [PDF]