This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by LEE, N. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

The Challenge of Childhood

Distributions of Childhood's Ambiguity in Adult Institutions

Keele University, UK soa03{at}keele.ac.uk

Three case studies of the position of children within adult institutions are reported. Each study examines the difficulties that surround children speaking for themselves. The studies focus on three different scales of analysis, moving from the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, to a regional crisis in child protection in the UK, to the constraints and opportunities for children as witnesses in UK courtrooms. At each scale of analysis it is argued that rather than making clear and univocal assumptions about children's capacities, adult institutions display an inability to decide on what status they should accord to children's utterances. As bearers of `childhood', children cut an ambiguous figure within adult institutions. An explanation of this ambiguity is offered in terms of adult institution's characteristic means of procuring their own legitimacy. Childhood's ambiguity, which is at once a product of, and a hindrance to, institutional legitimacy is typically `managed' by institutions by deferring the moment of its resolution. Childhood ambiguity is thus open to distribution and redistribution. Deferral can push the burden of ambiguity onto children's shoulders. It is through this deferral of ambiguity that children's ability to speak for themselves in adult institutions is made problematic. The implications of these case studies for social studies of childhood that aim at increasing children's opportunities for self-representation within adult institutions are explored.

Key Words: ambiguity • childhood • children's rights • institution • legitimacy

Childhood, Vol. 6, No. 4, 455-474 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/0907568299006004005


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Reynaert, M. Bouverne-de-Bie, and S. Vandevelde A Review of Children's Rights Literature Since the Adoption of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child Childhood, November 1, 2009; 16(4): 518 - 534. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Kullman Enacting Traffic Spaces Space and Culture, May 1, 2009; 12(2): 205 - 217. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Baraldi Promoting Self-Expression in Classroom Interactions Childhood, May 1, 2008; 15(2): 239 - 257. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Eriksson and E. Nasman Participation in Family Law Proceedings for Children Whose Father is Violent to Their Mother Childhood, May 1, 2008; 15(2): 259 - 275. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Rappert On the Mid Range: An Exercise in Disposing (or Minding the Gaps) Science Technology Human Values, November 1, 2007; 32(6): 693 - 712. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Komulainen The Ambiguity of the Child's 'Voice' in Social Research Childhood, February 1, 2007; 14(1): 11 - 28. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Green An overwhelming sense of injustice? An exploration of child sexual abuse in relation to the concept of justice Critical Social Policy, February 1, 2006; 26(1): 74 - 100. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Neyland Dismissed Content and Discontent: An Analysis of the Strategic Aspects of Actor-Network Theory Science Technology Human Values, January 1, 2006; 31(1): 29 - 51. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. Rappert Prohibitions, Weapons and Controversy:: Managing the Problems of Ordering Social Studies of Science, April 1, 2005; 35(2): 211 - 240. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. Hemrica and F. Heyting Tacit Notions of Childhood: An analysis of discourse about child participation in decision-making regarding arrangements in case of parental divorce Childhood, November 1, 2004; 11(4): 449 - 468. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. Mannion and J. I'anson Beyond the Disneyesque: Children's Participation, Spatiality and Adult-Child Relations Childhood, August 1, 2004; 11(3): 303 - 318. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Leonard Children's Views on Children's Right to Work: Reflections from Belfast Childhood, February 1, 2004; 11(1): 45 - 61. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Wyness, L. Harrison, and I. Buchanan Childhood, Politics and Ambiguity: Towards an Agenda for Children's Political Inclusion Sociology, February 1, 2004; 38(1): 81 - 99. [Abstract] [PDF]