| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
'Beyond Anti-Smacking'Rethinking parentchild relationsStirling University
Scottish Centre for Social Research, Edinburgh Recently, it has been argued that anti-smacking campaigns have been so successful that explicit pro-smackers are now thin on the ground. Yet the use of physical chastisement remains widespread. One response to this contradiction is to focus less on parents and more on children's rights. In this article, however, the authors draw on data from a recent Scottish study of parents views of physical chastisement to answer the following question: If the starting point for parents in thinking about physical chastisement is not children's rights, why is this the case and what are the implications for moving the debate forward? Drawing on a more dialogical understanding of parentchild relations and recent sociological work on childhood, we conclude that while future campaigns against physical chastisement need to be shaped by a children's rights perspective, they also need to be informed by understandings of the parentchild relationship and the meaning(s) disciplining has for parents within that relationship.
Key Words: legislation and public opinion parentchild relations physical chastisement rights
Childhood, Vol. 13, No. 4,
479-498 (2006) |
|||