Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Childhood
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balen, R.
Right arrow Articles by Manby, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Involving Children in Health and Social Research

‘Human becomings’ or ‘active beings’?

Rachel Balen

University of Huddersfield, r.balen{at}hud.ac.uk

Eric Blyth

University of Huddersfield

Helen Calabretto

University of South Australia

Claire Fraser

Christine Horrocks

University of Huddersfield

Martin Manby

Nationwide Children’s Research Centre, Huddersfield

This article draws on the authors’ experiences of undertaking health and social research involving children in Australia and England and focuses on securing the informed consent of children to participate in such research. A clear trend within literature, service provision, legislation and international conventions recognizes children as ‘active beings’ in all aspects of their lives. The services that are the focus of the research and evaluation projects in which the authors have been involved sought to empower children as active agents and decision-makers. Crucially, not only were these services available directly to children without requiring parental permission, but many children were also accessing these services without their parents’ knowledge. However, when it came to researching and evaluating users’ experiences of these services, the authors faced the problem that existing research gatekeeping systems tended to construct children as dependent, in need of protection and as ‘human becomings’. The authors found that research ethics committees would permit the research to take place only if both the child’s informed consent and that of his or her parents was obtained. The authors outline the implications of such dilemmas, which may not only be counter productive in terms of research objectives but also risk failing to afford children rightful regard in contemporary society. While the authors conclude that there are no quick fixes to the resolution of such dilemmas, they believe that researchers need to engage with the gatekeepers of research to ensure that the laudable effort to protect potentially vulnerable participants avoids overprotection, paternalism and the further disenfranchisement of already marginalized young people.

Key Words: ‘Gillick competence’ • informed consent • research

Childhood, Vol. 13, No. 1, 29-48 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0907568206059962


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChildhoodHome page
I. Coyne, E. Hayes, and P. Gallagher
Research With Hospitalized Children: Ethical, methodological and organizational challenges
Childhood, August 1, 2009; 16(3): 413 - 429.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ChildhoodHome page
K. Backett-Milburn, S. Wilson, A. Bancroft, and S. Cunningham-Burley
Challenging Childhoods: Young people's accounts of `getting by' in families with substance use problems
Childhood, November 1, 2008; 15(4): 461 - 479.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Deaf Stud Deaf EducHome page
E. Brunnberg, M. L. Bostrom, and M. Berglund
Self-Rated Mental Health, School Adjustment, and Substance Use in Hard-of-Hearing Adolescents
J. Deaf Stud. Deaf Educ., July 1, 2008; 13(3): 324 - 335.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child Health CareHome page
F. A. Carnevale, M. E. Macdonald, M. Bluebond-Langner, and P. McKeever
Using participant observation in pediatric health care settings: ethical challenges and solutions
J Child Health Care, March 1, 2008; 12(1): 18 - 32.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
A. Grinyer
The biographical impact of teenage and adolescent cancer
Chronic Illness, December 1, 2007; 3(4): 265 - 277.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Chronic IllnessHome page
L. Frith
Researching chronic childhood illness: autonomy or beneficence?
Chronic Illness, September 1, 2006; 2(3): 178 - 180.
[PDF]